Thursday, December 19, 2019

The Death Of Orlando Florida - 999 Words

Agreement was granting him the â€Å"Exclusive† right to vacation with the children and preference in odds years (2015 being the odd year). Moreover, the father did not know if his proposed order or this of the opposing counsel would be signed by the honorable Judge Bernstein when he left to Orlando with the children. Nevertheless, the order was signed in December 21, 2015 and was not entered in the system until December 24, 2015. Subsequent to this signing, the father was never served with the order. The Father left to Orlando Florida on December 27, 2015 and, by that time, he had not been served with the signed order of the Honorable Judge Bernstein. Neither the Court System nor the Mother’s attorney serve the father with the court order and†¦show more content†¦The father was under the honest impression, and was his argument, that his vacation time schedule had preference over any other vacations granted on the agreement to the mother in odd years. Neverthe less, the order signed on December 21, 2015 does not mentioned whether or not the father had preference to take his vacation with the children. The order stated as follows: â€Å"The Mother s Motion to Enforce Mediated Agreement is DENIED, as moot on the grounds that no variation of the Mediated Agreement has been requested. The agreement stands on its own.† (R. 748). It was not until January 18, 2016, when the opposing counsel filed a motion for contempt, that the father found out about the order that was entered on December 24, 2015. Consequently, the father did not have knowledge at any previous time before returning with the children from Orlando. Even if the father had received this order, the order was not clear enough to make the father understand what vacation dates had preference, which was the issue in dispute when the parties brought the issue to the court on December. II. THE LOWER TRIBUNAL ERRED WHEN GRANTED THE MOTHER ATTORNEY’S FEES IN A NON-EVIDENTIARY HEARING CONTRARY TO THE DUE PROCESS PROTECTION OFFERED UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION. A. No state can deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. The Supreme court of Florida, has held that â€Å"that the trial court s exercise of

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.